Statement from the Center for "Race," Culture and Social Justice Directors (May 17, 2019)

The Center for “Race,” Culture and Social Justice was inaugurated in 2017, aiming to promote and study questions of diversity and inclusion at Hofstra and beyond. The evidence of Hofstra’s prior challenge to attract and retain full-time tenure-track black faculty members, and other faculty of color, due to multiple factors, was included in the initial proposal to senior administration, which was submitted during AAUP contract negotiations; similar evidence regarding the paucity of administrators of color, particularly at the senior level, was addressed in the proposal. The Center’s core mission has also encompassed efforts to encourage faculty scholarship that features “race” as a central framework of analysis. It seeks to examine culture and social justice issues as they intersect with our understanding of how “race” and racism operate in oppressive institutional structures (https://www.hofstra.edu/academics/race-culture-social-justice/about.html).

The Center has from the start been envisioned as a collective, multivocal space for respectful academic discussion of sensitive and substantive issues. It has had a productive first two years, the fruits of which are well documented on its website (https://www.hofstra.edu/academics/race-culture-social-justice/). One of its primary initiatives was to encourage Hofstra to expedite the hiring of a Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer (CDIO) to address campus bias and discrimination. The Center is proud to report that this mission has now been accomplished. A second initiative was to encourage the university to implement diversity awareness, sensitivity, and implicit bias training at all levels of the institution; again, we are beginning to see progress in this area from a number of units on campus. Finally, the Center is working to help revive the Africana Studies program that began in 1971. It will take ongoing leadership from faculty affiliated with the Center for “Race”, collaboration from other units and Centers on campus, and the full solidarity and support of Hofstra faculty and students at large, to reimagine a viable AFST program for the twenty-first century which can anchor diversity and inclusion at the curricular level on this campus.

It is, on the one hand, disappointing to see that the achievements of the Center to support faculty and students of color— made possible due to the intense, continuing commitment of its members and allied groups and units on campus—have been put into question. On the other hand, engaged participation, and critical dialogue by and between students and faculty alike, are pivotal as we continue to address difficult questions. The Center was conceived as, and has consistently attempted to provide, a supportive space for student activists and other students of color; it has tried to amplify their voices by sponsoring their events, participating in their roundtables, and encouraging them to share their thoughts in this blog, among other ways. Faculty and associates affiliated to the Center have responded enthusiastically to their concerns, but we also understand that this is an ongoing process and that there are challenges ahead of us.

We therefore call for continued collegiality, careful reflection, and respectful dialogue, on the part of faculty and students, and for the active support of our university administration. Together, we can achieve more. We have real work to do and we share a common endeavor. The Center for “Race,” Culture and Social Justice will continue to be an inclusive and safe space for all, committed to our collective mission as we keep on re-envisioning it. We will continue this dialogue in the fall semester.  
Nota bene: This statement was written in response to an email chain, initiated by a student and former fellow of the Center beginning on May 8, 2019. The emails were addressed to several Center advisory board members and other members of the Hofstra community not associated with the Center, including faculty and administrators. Although we used a rhetorical “we” as a gesture of inclusion and collective ideas, the statement actually represents an interpretive narrative of only the Center directors and we accept full responsibility for its content.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Sacrificing Moral Character for Political Expediency: Reflections on Election2024" by Jonathan Lightfoot and Veronica Lippencott

As directors of the Center for “Race,” Culture and Social Justice, we seek to frame the recent re-election of Donald Trump as a social justice issue at the intersections of “race,” culture, religion, and politics. We are disheartened to discover that the United States of America chose a white male, 34-count convicted felon, an adjudicated rapist, psychopathic narcissist, and a pathological liar over a highly qualified Black woman of Asian descent with a clean record of criminal or civil liability. In fact, sitting Vice President Kamala Harris had the highest level of elected office experience of anyone who has sought the presidency during the last 65 years. We posit that finger pointing and blaming does little good without an understanding of the historical, social, and political contexts that yielded such results. The United States of America was founded on white supremacy, Indigenous people’s genocide, African people’s enslavement, and female oppression. The vast majority of Donald’s...
Read more

“Intellectual Bondage: Toward a Politics and Hybridity of Academic Writing” by Tyler Thier

Image
  In “ The Politics of Citation ,” Annabel Kim envisions this titular convention as “the map of a process, not the map of a territory.” She barrels onward, arguing for citation not as a site of accruing intellectual capital where the rich get richer and the stars get brighter while the precariat writing against erasure gets forgotten and poorer, but as a jubilee that levels the fields in which we write so that we might accrue an extravagant set of debts resulting not in intellectual bondage but in intellectual freedom. I’m a writing scholar, so I know quite well that writing is situational, dependent on rhetorical purpose, audience, kairos, and so on, that it flexes across genres and adapts itself to various ethical schema. But just because this is an observed truth in my discipline doesn’t mean it should be fundamentalized. The goal of writing studies and composition is to acclimate students to the idea that writing is an essential object unto ...
Read more

“Mental Health Awareness for Students of Color” by Sasha Ferdinand

Image
Mental health awareness is crucial in communities of color for several reasons. Promoting mental health awareness in communities of color is vital to address the unique challenges and barriers these communities face. It is essential for breaking down stigma, improving access to resources, and providing culturally competent care to ensure everyone has the support they need for their mental well-being. More specifically, how these benefits are necessary for students of color in college. As mentioned, many communities of color face significant stigma around mental health issues. There might be cultural norms or beliefs that stigmatize mental health discussions or seeking professional help. Awareness initiatives can help break down these barriers by providing accurate information and encouraging open conversations. Mental health resources on college campuses vary, but typically, most universities offer a range of support services for students. Counseling Centers are a predominant resource...
Read more