Queering Latinx: Intersectionality Matters by Michelle Boo, Center’s Fellow since September 2018
When Kimberle Crenshaw coined the term intersectionality in
1989, the term became an integral part of Black feminism. Crenshaw refers to
intersectionality as “the
various ways in which race and gender interact to shape the multiple dimensions
of Black women's employment.” Of
course, intersectionality doesn’t only apply to Black women. The word
intersectionality was created to convey that no identity exists independent of
itself, in relation to race. This means that intersectionality is clearly a
race theory that explains how race affects the oppression of other marginalized
identities an individual might have.
This
concept ties into the idea of strategic essentialism first introduced by the Indian literary critic and theorist Gayatri
Chakravorty Spivak. Strategic essentialism is a tactic employed by a
minority group acting on their shared identity in the public area in the
interests of unity during a struggle for equal rights. Because of strategic
essentialism queer people of color always have to sacrifice a part of their
identity to find community. Identity can be both unifying and isolating. This
is why intersectionality is such an important topic, to discuss.
Queer people of color are often asked to speak for the
entirety of their race or for the entirety of queer people due to often being
the minority in a space. The educating they do is often not by choice but by
force. Performing this kind of labor, like in activists can lead to burnout.
This can be a strenuous and often an unpleasant position to be in and without
taking into consideration the tug-of-war being waged inside an individual with
more than one identity, the nuance of the term intersectionality is lost when
discussing individuals that are nonblack and also not women.
The difficulty in forming a comprehensive identity that fits
an understandable mold, that the greater society will receive well is
difficult. While race and ethnicity are visible, identities like sexuality and
gender can be a lot more internal. These identities can be hidden regardless of
the toll it may have on one's mental health. Yet, these identities are strongly
impacted by ethnicity, race, and class.
Who is
Latinx? This is as complex as the
colloquial terms that each Latinx person due to origin speak. The concept of
Latinx is often used to indicate ethnicity, race, and geological region of a
specific individual in the scope of American understanding. Of course, this can
be limiting when speaking to someone that doesn’t know the diverse countries
and regions a person can be from. The
way race and ethnicity can be consolidated within a person but clashes with
societal norms which lends to a type of cognitive dissonance that can damage a
person's self-image. This is toxic to queer Latinx’s who have to abide by the
expectations of the word Latinx. Not to mention that while the word libertates
many Latinxs, in and of itself it is a colonial construct that serves to
oppress as well.
The origin of the work Latinx is American. It is often used
in relation to Americans who have ties (ie. origins) to Latin American
countries. Latinx is used as an identifier in the United States that can be
both unifying and alienating. It is a categorization that has led to not only
othering but also to the misidentification of all Latinx’s as people of color.
In reality, not all people that are Latinx are people of color, the
conceptualization, and application of intersectionality to these people would then
be inaccurate. Rendering an entire diverse population of black and native
peoples from what is considered to be latin america is not only offensive but
also highly concerning.
Identity is tricky. Trying to
consolidate the discrepancies between who you are, and you were supposed to be
can be heartbreaking, difficult, and scary. For queer people of color, this
process that should be seen as a right of passage and a way of life is instead
seen as something white people do. This is because gender and sexuality as is
categorized in western culture is based on a colonialist set of expectations
dating back to the strict adherence of organized religion as a way of
structuring society. This is not to say that organized religion didn’t exist in
other cultures but in this form of organized religion focuses on patriarchal
concepts that alienate women and gender variant people. It’s well known that in
other countries such as India and Mexico there are pronouns for ‘third gender’
and in the United States, the term two-spirit is used for people that are
considered to be queer. Thus the concept of a binary gender system in western
in origin and specific to white systems of thought.
In conclusion
intersectionality is a race theory specifically for the intersections of gender
and race for black women that affect their daily lives. Yet, it can also be
applied for and towards other people of color. It is not appropriate for non
people of color to use this term to express the cultural disparities they face
due to their marginalized identities. The reason intersectionality was used to
briefly analyze the tangible intersections between sexuality, gender, and race
as it pertains to queer Latinx people was because the experiences of black
women are similar to those face by Latinx people. This was done to discuss a
population in the United States that is othered by American culture and their
native cultures due to colonialism. The concept of intersectionality is the
ideal theory to use when discussing queer latinx people because their
sexuality, gender, and ethnicity are usually minority identities that face
heavy discrimination in the United states. Without the explanation that
intersectionality offers this disparity would continue to be ignored.
When Kimberle Crenshaw coined the term intersectionality in
1989, the term became an integral part of Black feminism. Crenshaw refers to
intersectionality as “ the
various ways in which race and gender interact to shape the multiple dimensions
of Black women's employment.” Of
course, intersectionality doesn’t only apply to Black women. The word
intersectionality was created to convey that no identity exists independent of
itself, in relation to race. This means that intersectionality is clearly a
race theory that explains how race affects the oppression of other marginalized
identities an individual might have.
This
concept ties into the idea of strategic essentialism first introduced by the Indian literary critic and theorist Gayatri
Chakravorty Spivak. Strategic essentialism is a tactic employed by a
minority group acting on their shared identity in the public area in the
interests of unity during a struggle for equal rights. Because of strategic
essentialism queer people of color always have to sacrifice a part of their
identity to find community. Identity can be both unifying and isolating. This
is why intersectionality is such an important topic, to discuss.
Queer people of color are often asked to speak for the
entirety of their race or for the entirety of queer people due to often being
the minority in a space. The educating they do is often not by choice but by
force. Performing this kind of labor, like in activists can lead to burnout.
This can be a strenuous and often an unpleasant position to be in and without
taking into consideration the tug-of-war being waged inside an individual with
more than one identity, the nuance of the term intersectionality is lost when
discussing individuals that are nonblack and also not women.
The difficulty in forming a comprehensive identity that fits
an understandable mold, that the greater society will receive well is
difficult. While race and ethnicity are visible, identities like sexuality and
gender can be a lot more internal. These identities can be hidden regardless of
the toll it may have on one's mental health. Yet, these identities are strongly
impacted by ethnicity, race, and class.
Who is
Latinx? This is as complex as the
colloquial terms that each Latinx person due to origin speak. The concept of
Latinx is often used to indicate ethnicity, race, and geological region of a
specific individual in the scope of American understanding. Of course, this can
be limiting when speaking to someone that doesn’t know the diverse countries
and regions a person can be from. The
way race and ethnicity can be consolidated within a person but clashes with
societal norms which lends to a type of cognitive dissonance that can damage a
person's self-image. This is toxic to queer Latinx’s who have to abide by the
expectations of the word Latinx. Not to mention that while the word libertates
many Latinxs, in and of itself it is a colonial construct that serves to
oppress as well.
The origin of the work Latinx is American. It is often used
in relation to Americans who have ties (ie. origins) to Latin American
countries. Latinx is used as an identifier in the United States that can be
both unifying and alienating. It is a categorization that has led to not only
othering but also to the misidentification of all Latinx’s as people of color.
In reality, not all people that are Latinx are people of color, the
conceptualization, and application of intersectionality to these people would then
be inaccurate. Rendering an entire diverse population of black and native
peoples from what is considered to be latin america is not only offensive but
also highly concerning.
Identity is tricky. Trying to
consolidate the discrepancies between who you are, and you were supposed to be
can be heartbreaking, difficult, and scary. For queer people of color, this
process that should be seen as a right of passage and a way of life is instead
seen as something white people do. This is because gender and sexuality as is
categorized in western culture is based on a colonialist set of expectations
dating back to the strict adherence of organized religion as a way of
structuring society. This is not to say that organized religion didn’t exist in
other cultures but in this form of organized religion focuses on patriarchal
concepts that alienate women and gender variant people. It’s well known that in
other countries such as India and Mexico there are pronouns for ‘third gender’
and in the United States, the term two-spirit is used for people that are
considered to be queer. Thus the concept of a binary gender system in western
in origin and specific to white systems of thought.
In conclusion
intersectionality is a race theory specifically for the intersections of gender
and race for black women that affect their daily lives. Yet, it can also be
applied for and towards other people of color. It is not appropriate for non
people of color to use this term to express the cultural disparities they face
due to their marginalized identities. The reason intersectionality was used to
briefly analyze the tangible intersections between sexuality, gender, and race
as it pertains to queer Latinx people was because the experiences of black
women are similar to those face by Latinx people. This was done to discuss a
population in the United States that is othered by American culture and their
native cultures due to colonialism. The concept of intersectionality is the
ideal theory to use when discussing queer latinx people because their
sexuality, gender, and ethnicity are usually minority identities that face
heavy discrimination in the United states. Without the explanation that
intersectionality offers this disparity would continue to be ignored.
Add caption |
I am
Michelle Boo, a Junior Psychology Major with a minor in LACS. I'm Latinx and
use she/her/hers pronouns, and I serve as a fellow of the Center for “Race,”
Culture and Social Justice at Hofstra since September 2018
Comments
Post a Comment